Oh. My. God.
I knew the Europeans were more liberal, in general, but this is taking things a little too far.Judge HFM Hofhuis ruled that the Brotherly Love, Freedom and Diversity Party (PNVD) had the same right to exist as any other political party.
The PNVD was formed by three paedophiles in May, prompting outrage in Dutch society. It seeks to lower the age of sexual consent from 16 to 12 and legalise child pornography and sex with animals .....
..... But the PNVD says it is not just a one-issue party. It also wants children from the age of 12 to be able to vote. It promotes the legalisation of hard and soft drugs and free train travel for all.
I'm quite agitated right now. Age of consent to be 12? Who are you kidding? What bloody consent? You need to be fully aware to give consent and you certainly aren't fully aware at 12. And what the hell is this free train travel for all? So you could travel the length of your land? Visiting children and ravaging them?
I first noticed them early last month. I was mad then. I'm still mad now.
Natural introvert, learned extrovert.
About Me
- Fiona Kathleen Hogan
- Testy, cynical and Eurasian. I won't play well with you if you have no bloody common sense. All comments & emails sent me become fodder for my blog.
My radio stations!
Special mentions
My alter ego
Kitty Greatness
My Betters
Information that won't save my life
More stuff that won't save my life.
Go on - explore!
Blog Archive
Powered by Blogger.
1:01 am
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Unreal and disgusting
TJ, I get so angry just thinking about it!
I believe someone should form the Castrate all Paedophiles party. I have to admit Holland is a little bit too liberal. I don't think I will be taking my family there for vacation any time soon.
Peace
Hi Greg. The Dutch are.... indeed.... liberal (ahem).
Now while i believe pedophilia is a morally corrupting subject, I think the judge was right to rule in favor of having them exist.
First is that if the judge were to ban them from becomming a political party then they would cry about not getting their rights.
(because they are a "Free Democratic Country" just like us)
(while that does have its drawbacks)
Then a possibility might be that they would draw major attention to the issue and before you know it they would have so many supporters in favor of individuality and inalienable (i probably spelled that wrong) rights that they might just get their way in the end.
Right now they have been made a party and everyones disgusted like they should be and it will be near impossible for them to get supporters!
Hi Anon.
You raise good points. Something to think about.
However, I personally believe that the judiciary also has an obligation to view things from a socially conscious point of view as well. Therein lies my strenuous objections! :)
Post a Comment